Linux: Still Awesome & Mafia$oft : Still Hitler

Just putting it out there that nothing changed.

Remember kids, if you like Mafia$oft, you are worthless. You are the worst human being and the cause of all the world's problems. THIS IS FACT.

Real men, proud men and smart men only use one OS that is called GNU/Linux. Anyone else deserves to eat horse shit for being such a self-hating emo dickface.

I don't really feel the need to blog anymore because it's obvious Mafia$oft is at such a crazy decline towards bankrupcy. Their last gasp, Windoze8, is going to be a hilarious flop.

Google and Apple are eating their lunch, and Linux is dominating the future of devices via Android GNU/Linux. What the fuck is the point anymore? Mafia$oft is a has been, and anyone who thinks otherwise is probably mentally ill. There is no point convincing people like that.

Voltaire, an early Free Culture activist?

“The instruction we find in books is like fire. We fetch it from our neighbours, kindle it at home, communicate it to others, and it becomes the property of all.”

— Voltaire

Still relevent today

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH!

-- Patrick Henry, honorary GNU/Linux enthusiast

Pragmatism

Winbreds would like you to believe that principles and morality is bad.

They are self-proclaimed “pragmatics”, which in Winbred words roughly translates to “do things without regard to its greater effect on the World”.

I support Free Software because it’s better for the World. If software engineers worked together instead of against each other, we wouldn’t have to reinvent the same wheels over and over.

Proprietary software has the idea that taking something that can be copied infinitely and artificially restricting it’s supply (artificial scarcity) is somehow a sensible idea. That we should invest millions to write software and impose it on our users, a software which serves no other purpose but make their software less useful and restrict their rights (DRM).

Instead of hiring thousands of engineers to make improve the state of technology, we must hire thousands of lawyers and sue each other ad infinitum in courts over vaguely worded software patents.

We are on the verge of a world without suffering and death. We already have the technology to distribute the sum of human knowledge to all humanity.

But Winbreds are busy coming up with more inventive ways to fuck over each other to care about any of that.

The right tool for the job, but nobody asks why the job exists in the first place.

It’s no matter. Winbreds are only interested on what is the optimal life configuration for pissing, shitting and fucking. Essentially, they think and act no different than an animal would and they build their life without any higher philosophy or purpose. That’s pragmatism.

Hooray for pragmatism.

Banned from this site: reactosguy and ThomasB

Both are traitors who scummed to "digital peer pressure" because they are spineless cowards. They are sulking to their former tormentors in some futile attempt to fit in. I don't need such backstabbers polluting my glorious blog. I would gladly welcome to my home the most disgusting and extreme Winbred over the slightest traitor.

Linux beats Windoze 7 in Power Managment; Winbred's FUD spree is over

According to Phoronix's latest benchmarks, Linux is doing better in power management over Windoze 7. Remember the FUD the Winbreds spread about Linux's power management? Well these results make them look like the fools they are.

Interest in WebGL on the rise; Mafia$oft panics

Mafia$oft Internet Exploiter is the only mainstream web browser without WebGL support. The monopolistic entity wrote a FUD-filled diatribe about WebGL is supposedly insecure. Remember this is from the same company who brought us Internet "Bonzi Buddy" Exploiter. You know, that browser which is the malware author's wet dream.

They are talking shit not because they know anything about security or care about security in any case. They rather have their proprietary DefectX/Silverscum software instead of the industry developed, open standard based WebGL and OpenGL ES. Of course they hate open standards because their whole business model is to lock people into their proprietary garbage.

Well, it won't work, you fucking evil Nazi scumbags. You will not fuck over the computer industry and progress anymore.